The myth of the thousand updates for Linux, debunked
October 23, 2007 – 8:46 pm. Filed under linux by Sathya .->
Rudd- has written in his blog about Distribution X downloading oh-so-many updates, everyday. He says:
For the last six months, I’ve been reading article after article spewing the same bovine manure: Look at how many updates Distribution X issued! How can it be more secure than Windows? Let’s bury that stupidity under a ton of facts:
“Look at the pace of the update releases!”
Microsoft shills’ latest tune goes something like this: “but Linux is so much more insecure than Windows — just look, every day you see security updates released!”.
True: open up your Linux distribution’s update manager after three months of not upgrading, and you will see quite the list. Probably a bit more than your Windows or Mac OS X updates.
But only a minority are security updates. From that minority, only a handful apply to your scenario. And even so, the number of updates is of no consequence. As a matter of fact, you should be happy you have all these updates for you to install.
Don’t just take my word for it — let’s explore why.
Linux updates: much more modular
When you update your Linux system, you’re not just updating the operating system, but system services, libraries, applications and artwork as well. In a modern Linux distribution, you can expect about a thousand quarter-of-a-megabyte discrete applications (packages), instead of ten monolithic applications.
Popularity: 1% [?]






